Just ask your agent
Claude Code, Cursor
Good at: Reads today’s code and answers well. In a blind test it matched Nosy on answer quality.
Missing: Starts from zero every session. Doesn’t remember what merged Tuesday, which request it was for, or that you said "two days".
Good at: Great maps of the codebase and its history, served to engineers and agents.
Missing: A map, not a verdict. No bets, no "shipped against what we decided", no score.
Spec-driven tools
Spec Kit, Kiro, Taskmaster, CCPM
Good at: Turn a decision into specs, tasks and PRs. CCPM even uses git and issues as the source of truth.
Missing: They go forward from the decision. Nobody closes the loop: did it land, how long did it take, was the bet right?
Good at: Research, specs and roadmaps inside a full PM suite, with AI agents on top.
Missing: SaaS seats, and they read tickets, not what actually reached the branch.
Engineering metrics
Swarmia, Jellyfish
Good at: Strong at reading delivery from git for engineering leaders.
Missing: Priced per developer, built for managers. No product bets, no decision page.
Nosy
free, MIT, in your agent
The record of what landed, against which decision, and a weekly score for every bet. Memory lives in your repo, not in a session.
Nosy was here.
Based on public docs, changelogs and pricing pages, Sep 2026. Our own column is scored by us, so read it with that in mind.